我的前半生

Toddler 'formulas' are unnecessary and lack nutritional benefits of milk, pediatrician group warns_我的网站

一 |     　　当地时间8月21日，美国总统特朗普在南卡罗来纳州演讲时重申，必须阻止伊朗发展核武器。    Beverages marketed as toddler "formula" are unnecessary and some have questionable marketing practices, according to a new report from the American Academy of Pediatrics.In recent years, the popularity of these formulas — referred to as Older Infant and Young Child Formulas (OIYCFs) — has risen significantly, according to research published in the journal Public Health Nutrition. The study found sales went up by 158% between 2006 and 2015. However, experts say there are several concerns surrounding their usage."Many parents mistakenly believe that OIYCFs offer something more, something unique that cow milk together with a varied diet with fortified foods can't provide," Dr. George Fuchs, professor of pediatrics and epidemiology at the University of Kentucky and lead author on the new AAP report, told ABC News. "This misconception can be largely attributed to the advertising and branding of these products."The AAP recommends babies drink infant formula or breastmilk until they are 12 months old and then transition to cow's milk in addition to solid foods, which are typically introduced at about 6 months.Toddler "formula" is sometimes marketed as a "transitional" or "weaning" formula for infants who are 0 -12 months old, according to the new report. But unlike infant formula, which must meet certain FDA guidelines for nutritional content, there are no standard nutritional requirements for toddler "formula," the report says."Toddler formula is unnecessary for the vast majority of toddlers and its nutritional value is inferior to that of whole cow's milk, especially when accounting for the additional sugar content of toddler formula," Dr. Keyana Washington, a pediatrician with Gwinnett Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine in Georgia, who was not involved with the report, told ABC News.There are misconceptions about the drinks, according to Dr. Nagela Sainté-Thomas, a pediatric emergency medicine specialist from El Paso, Texas."One reason for their popularity is parents and caregivers believe these drinks provide nutrients similar to solid foods and if they have significant challenges integrating solids into their toddler's diet, they can easily utilize this 'nutritional' substitution," Sainté-Thomas, who was not involved in the AAP report, told ABC News.In 1986, The World Health Assembly had already identified special formulas for older infants as unnecessary. Many global health organizations -- including the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and UNICEF, in addition to WHO -- emphasize that a combination of breast milk, whole cow's milk, water, and appropriate solid foods is nutritionally sufficient for most toddlers.Toddler "formulas" are not necessarily dangerous or bad for children, the AAP said in its report. They can be part of a balanced diet for babies 12 months and older, but are not better than cow's milk, the report said.But some companies making OIYCFs imply that their products add an important part of a toddler diet, even though that's not the case, according to the new AAP report.OIYCFs often appear very similar to infant formulas, according to the AAP report, which may cause confusion among parents and caregivers. Some companies use similar names, colors, designs, and even slogans for their OIYCFs and infant formulas, the report found.The pediatricians ABC News spoke with say parents and caregivers should make sure toddlers have a varied diet that includes fruits, vegetables, whole grains, proteins, dairy, water, and either breast milk, infant formula, or whole cow's milk.Parents and caregivers should talk to their pediatricians about the role OIYCFs might play in their child's diet."The decision to deviate from the recommendation to give whole cow's milk starting at age 12 months is one that parents should make in consultation with their pediatrician," Washington said.Daniel A. Carnegie, MD, MPH, MBA is a preventive medicine resident at The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and a member of the ABC News Medical Unit.。　　特朗普还称伊朗非常渴望达成协议。他说：“我们甚至不知道自己是否真的想达成协议，因为在我看来，霍尔木兹海峡现在是美国的领土，它就是美国的领土。”　　此前，特朗普已提过霍尔木兹海峡为“美国新领土”，伊方称其为“妄想”。　　18日早些时候，美国总统特朗普发布图片，称霍尔木兹海峡为“美国新领土”。伊朗方面随即在社交媒体附上特朗普这条帖文的截图并驳斥道，“特朗普在其妄想中继续声称‘霍尔木兹海峡是美国领土’”。　　针对美国总统的相关言论，伊朗副外长加里巴巴迪发文驳斥称，“特朗普关于霍尔木兹海峡的妄想要么自行纠正，要么将由我们来纠正。”　　伊朗官员：美国已证明其“不懂外交语言”　　当地时间21日，伊朗伊斯兰议会国家安全和外交政策委员会主席易卜拉欣·阿齐兹在社交媒体发文称，美国已经证明其“不懂外交的语言”，不会主动解除对伊制裁、释放伊朗相关资产，也不会停止其“海盗行径”。　　阿齐兹表示，历史将证明，“实力的语言”不仅将迫使美国采取上述措施，还将迫使美方向伊朗人民道歉，并最终撤出该地区。　　伊朗外长：美经济施压“注定失败”　　当地时间21日晚，伊朗外交部长阿拉格齐在社交媒体发文称，美国历届政府针对伊朗采取的制裁和施压政策均以失败告终，美国最新宣布的对伊经济施压行动同样“注定失败”。　　阿拉格齐在发文中回顾了美国近年来针对伊朗采取的一系列政策。他说，14年前美国宣称对伊朗实施“史上最严厉制裁”，8年前又对伊朗实施“极限施压”，5个月前提出要求伊朗“无条件投降”，这些政策最终均告失败。

二 | 　　针对特朗普日前宣布将对伊朗采取“有史以来针对国家的最具毁灭性的经济行动”，阿拉格齐表示，这一行动同样“注定失败”。他还批评美国历届政府对伊政策并无实质变化。　　阿拉格齐说：“这套戏码我们以前就看过，同样的谎言，只是换了一批霸凌者罢了。”　　当地时间8月21日，特朗普被问及美国对伊朗的军事选择是否有限时，特朗普表示：“这只是意味着我们正在观察事态的发展。”特朗普称，对伊朗转向“经济战”并不意味着美国军事选项受限。（文章来源：每日经济新闻）。

Current article:http://xsv.suiyangguiduanzudoushaopao.buzz/news/20260826_551679.html

Published on:01:10:47